Google doc redacted text reddit manual#
Google doc redacted text reddit full#
Google doc redacted text reddit free#

Fox News’s statement said very little, merely that the two parties “have agreed to part ways” and “we thank him for his service to the network.” After two days of silence, Carlson finally tweeted a video that didn’t directly address the situation.īut it’s also looking more and more likely that Carlson’s ouster was the result of a combination of factors, including disparaging remarks about Fox News executives, a toxic workplace culture, and Carlson’s view that he was untouchable at Fox News and that the network needed him more than he needed it. Since the pundit’s shocking departure and apparent firing on April 24, rumors have swirled as to what the host of one of the highest-rated shows on basic cable possibly could have done to merit it. It also may not have a guaranteed salary, as Musk claims Carlson is only getting subscription and advertising revenue, just like any creator.Ĭarlson’s announcement caps a tumultuous two weeks for him and Fox News. Twitter, it seems, won’t have such limits. Carlson implied that he was fired from Fox News for trying to tell the “fullest” truth too often.

Google doc redacted text reddit free#

He praised the social media site, which has touted its supposed free speech bona fides since it was taken over by Elon Musk last October. Carlson posted a short video on his Twitter account on May 9 announcing the news. It's a wait and see (or not) until then.Two weeks after former Fox News host Tucker Carlson’s stunning firing from the channel, he seems to have figured out his next step: Twitter. So what might we expect from the redacted affidavit, if Judge Reinhardt releases it? It's hard to know until we see it.

Google doc redacted text reddit full#

But when Zaid gave the government a copy of the man's obituary in an effort to get the full document released, 'they said, it's not him.' Cooper skyjacking case, for example, 'we thought a document pertained to a particular person who was dead,' he said. In FOIA litigation connected with the D.B. The client may be able to identify a witness, or piece together what was said in a discussion in which he or she participated, for example.īut generally, 'it's not a smart thing to speculate,' Zaid explained, because even educated guesses can be wrong. Zaid said that even when information in court papers is redacted, it's sometimes possible to figure out what's in the blacked-out sections. Whoever sent them had provided the original pages, rather than making a photocopy, he explained. Zaid said he once received some redacted documents in a case and discovered that he could hold them up and read the words through the black ink.

Google doc redacted text reddit manual#

'It's a really sloppy-looking redaction, but no one will ever see what I cut out.' In other instances, if he's instructed by the government to redact information from a document, he deletes the text and types the number of words and 'deleted by the request of CIA' in its place.īut manual redactions on actual paper can go awry, too. His preferred method is to 'literally cut it out with scissors and then photocopy the page,' he said. Zaid generally eschews electronic redaction.

18, 2022, that portions of the affidavit could be released, with stipulations. Justice Department objected to the release of the affidavit, saying it would compromise their investigation. Affidavits often contain information about what evidence law enforcement thinks is at a property, and other facts, including witnesses who may have provided testimony.

And attorneys for several media outlets, including The Associated Press, The New York Times, The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal, argued in court for the release of the affidavit supporting the warrant. Given the unprecedented nature of searching a former president's home, there was been an unusual amount of transparency surrounding the warrant. § 1519: Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in federal investigations and bankruptcy, which carries a penalty of up to 20 years in prison ( obstruction of justice). § 2071: Concealment, removal or mutilation generally, which carries a penalty of up to three years in prison and disqualification from holding office ( concealing of public records). § 793: Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information, which carries a penalty of up to 10 years in prison ( violation of the espionage act).